Author Topic: Power handling vs. amp output  (Read 13471 times)

Offline RuralTom

  • Audio Geek!
  • ***
  • Posts: 420
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Receiving Aural Pleasure....
Re: Power handling vs. amp output
« Reply #45 on: April 17, 2014, 03:37:00 PM »
I still don't quite get it, as demonstrated by a Bose 1801 amp listed currently on CL....  what the heck would one use a 400W per channel amp for?  I never see speakers rated for more than 200W at best.  Some little key to the mystery is still eluding me...
preamp: BAT VK-5
amp: Altec 944sa
DAC:  Bel Canto 2.5
CDP: Pioneer Elite DV-47a
Intel NUC server / iFi micro iUSB3.0 / Roon
Spendor FL9

bmwr75

  • Guest
Re: Power handling vs. amp output
« Reply #46 on: April 17, 2014, 05:53:47 PM »
I quit paying attention to speaker wattage ratings a long time ago.

If you are putting too much power to speakers, your ears will tell you right away.  Just be careful with the volume knob.

SunnyDaze

  • Guest
Re: Power handling vs. amp output
« Reply #47 on: April 17, 2014, 06:17:03 PM »
Stupid physics.  >:D  >:D  >:D

Offline TNRabbit

  • Audio Geek!
  • ***
  • Posts: 474
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • WTF are you looking at?
Re: Power handling vs. amp output
« Reply #48 on: April 17, 2014, 08:30:36 PM »
I still don't quite get it, as demonstrated by a Bose 1801 amp listed currently on CL....  what the heck would one use a 400W per channel amp for?  I never see speakers rated for more than 200W at best.  Some little key to the mystery is still eluding me...

Carver AL-IIIS are rated for 565 watts.  One of many.
TNRabbit


Carver SD/A-360 CDP feeding  Benchmark DAC-1
Sunfire Theater Grand-IV Processor/Sunfire Cinema Seven Signature Amp
Ashly XR-1001 & Rane PEQ-15s biamping AL-IIIs

Offline Kingman

  • Southern Commander
  • *****
  • Posts: 3127
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • OCCD...I GOT IT BADD!!!!!!!!!
Re: Power handling vs. amp output
« Reply #49 on: April 18, 2014, 06:53:51 AM »
One word... HEADROOM.
IN REALITY IT ONLY MATTERS WHAT IT SOUNDS LIKE TO YOU!!!!!