Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Suggestions welcome!
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Vintage HiFi Audio Forum
»
Audio Discussion
»
General Discussion
»
Belt vs. Direct Drive
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Belt vs. Direct Drive (Read 15656 times)
MasterBlaster
Administrator
Posts: 1100
Karma: +0/-0
Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
«
Reply #30 on:
January 08, 2010, 10:08:07 PM »
I love the dialogue going on here. It is purely fascinating read these posts.
Like I said, I just cant help jumping into the conversation at the expense
of seeming like a total noob. Thanks for putting up with my stupid ass.
Logged
HT: Audiocontrol Maestro M3, Sunfire 5*200, Tannoy Mercury MX , SVS PB-12 Sub
Head-Fi: FUBAR IV Plus DAC, Grado SR225
Living Room: Dynaco ST-70 (R&R work done by NATOE), Dynaco PAS Preamp, Jamo C607 towers, MCS 6710 Turntable
confused
Audio Geek!
Posts: 332
Karma: +0/-0
Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
«
Reply #31 on:
January 08, 2010, 10:11:51 PM »
Master Blaster- Do NOT apologize!! That was hilarious!
Logged
Dale
-Still Smoking!-
Slim-Shaddy
CARVER KILLER!!!
Posts: 1555
Karma: +0/-0
Tubes are for boobs
Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
«
Reply #32 on:
January 08, 2010, 10:12:37 PM »
No, master... it is soooo hard putting up with you;;;;; dumb
Logged
I am confident that an SL-1200 is capable of outperforming turntables of much higher expense with minor modification.
MasterBlaster
Administrator
Posts: 1100
Karma: +0/-0
Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
«
Reply #33 on:
January 08, 2010, 10:19:22 PM »
Hah. Thanks guys
Logged
HT: Audiocontrol Maestro M3, Sunfire 5*200, Tannoy Mercury MX , SVS PB-12 Sub
Head-Fi: FUBAR IV Plus DAC, Grado SR225
Living Room: Dynaco ST-70 (R&R work done by NATOE), Dynaco PAS Preamp, Jamo C607 towers, MCS 6710 Turntable
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Vintage HiFi Audio Forum
»
Audio Discussion
»
General Discussion
»
Belt vs. Direct Drive