Author Topic: I know car audio is a no-no  (Read 10248 times)

OldiesButGoodies

  • Guest
Re: I know car audio is a no-no
« Reply #15 on: June 24, 2014, 07:02:18 PM »
Atmos = object-oriented coding to put sounds in specific locations in your HT space.  It sounds promising if it works. 


Will add the board soon.

 ;D

Offline AdamG

  • Double Secret Probation!
  • **
  • Posts: 220
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: I know car audio is a no-no
« Reply #16 on: June 24, 2014, 07:10:44 PM »
Call me old fashioned, but my 4.1 surround (no center) powered by Marantz tuned w/ Audessey has me pretty happy. I don't see the need for anything over 7.1 unless your room is downright huge. In which case, line arrays for days!

Offline MacGeek

  • Ready For Intervention!
  • ******
  • Posts: 1465
  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: I know car audio is a no-no
« Reply #17 on: June 24, 2014, 08:57:51 PM »
Maybe I don't get it.  With video, all I hope to achieve is to put the sound where it originally belonged, with a reasonable sense of realism.  I suppose improved directionality is an improvement, just as is better resolution (audio and video).  In my 12 by 16 foot room, there isn't much more space, even in the walls/ceiling, to achieve that.  And, as much as I enjoy the theater, my audio system will always be the first priority when significant additional resources are available.

On the other hand, if I were starting over, I can imagine several dozen, small, wide range drivers scattered about the room, none of which would require much power, but all of which would present a substantial combined result.  Of course, for those of you who know me, each driver/channel would be voiced to maximize frequency response at it's location.  I guess I better start buying more EQ channels:)
Mac stuff, Sony HDR-F1HD AM/FM/HD tuner, Denon DRS 810 cassette, Denon CDR-W1500 CD recorder, Music Hall MMF-9 w/B&O MMC2, B & O 4002 w/B & O 20 CL, Revox A-77